Building a Global Movement for Human Unity

Building a Global Movement for Human Unity

Organize Locally, Collect Globallyby Roger Eaton

On the positive side, humanity is experiencing a welcome long range-trend towards greater understanding, acceptance, and even compassion. Literacy rates are going up. Living conditions are improving generally with proportionally more people being healthy and having to worry less about where the next meal is coming from. But this overall improvement is fueled by unsustainable economic practices. Through a combination of population growth, ever more powerful technologies, and a mistaken belief that we are separate from the natural world, humanity has overstepped nature’s limits. We need to leverage our intelligence and our growing sense of common humanity for a transition to a sustainable world. The great obstacle to our accomplishing such a transition is our appalling lack of unity.

The nations of the world spend some 1.8 trillion dollars annually on arms. The alarming stockpile of nuclear weapons on hair trigger alert is enough to destroy human civilization many times over. Armed as they are, the nations are naturally distrustful of each other and find it hard to cooperate.

We love our nations and religions and won’t give them up, but we must enlarge our sense of common humanity so we can cooperate fully on a global scale. We are no longer in a win-lose world, if we ever were. We have entered a world that is clearly either win-win or lose-lose. Only a powerful realization that we are all in the same boat can provide the perspective and political will needed to get us through the coming population peak without precipitous collapse. That is the big picture.

The Strategy

Nuclear weapons and the Security Council veto together are the great roadblock to Democratic World Federalism. Achieving nuclear disarmament and abolishing the veto go hand in hand, and for both we need a heartfelt sense of human unity. To get there, my suggestion is that we make The Goals of the UN a target that we share with as many people and organizations as possible.

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which were adopted unanimously by all 193 nations of the UN in September 2015, are awesome. It is hard to believe that the whole world has been able to agree on them. They include gender equality, an end to extreme poverty, combating climate change, reducing inequality and much more — all due by 2030. But they do not include disarmament. See the Wikipedia article for an introduction:

The Goals of the UN include both the SDGs and the other pre-existing goals of the UN such as disarmament, both nuclear and general, and human rights. Of course, DWF needs to keep its focus, but wherever possible, World Federalists should team up with forces that, while they have their own focus, are also targeting all the goals of the UN, just like we are. By aligning a movement for all the goals of the UN with the wave of SDG support that is building, we can influence others in the SDG movement to include disarmament in their thinking.

This strategy could work. There is an excellent argument that the SDGs cannot be achieved on their own without including disarmament in the package. Full cooperation is needed to achieve the SDGs, but nuclear arms are a visible sign that we live in an us vs them world where full cooperation is seen as a losing strategy for individual nations. Being armed to obliterate each other is just not a good foundation for cooperation and trust.

Then, too, there is the question of raising the money that will be needed to implement the SDGs. The estimate is about 4 trillion USD a year at a minimum. Military expenditures globally amount to about 1.8 trillion USD, so disarmament would be greatly helpful towards freeing up revenue needed for the SDGs. As a third argument, the actions of the military, even in peacetime, are highly damaging to the environment and so make progress towards sustainability more difficult.

A Nonviolent Global Citizens Movement (GCM)

To achieve The Goals of the UN we will need a massive nonviolent global citizens movement (GCM), nothing less. And yes, of course local organizing around local issues is a must. But as I see it for local organizing to be effective, it must be in the context of a global movement for human unity. But that global movement for human unity is the GCM we are working towards. How do we get around this Catch 22?

Voices of Humanity is my answer. It gives us the context that makes our local organizing meaningful on a global scale. As we build towards a full scale GCM, the Voice of Humanity-as-One boosts morale and gives us a sense of being in the same boat; the Voices of Women and Men build gender equality into the foundation of the global movement; and the Voices of Youth, Middle-age and Seniors maintain humanity’s sense of being in process rather than a static entity while helping to bring in young people, which we need to do.

What is Voices of Humanity?

Humanity has love, intelligence and spirit more than enough to overcome our difficulties. What we need is a tool to express our sense of unity in a way that does not box us in, but rather opens up avenues for cooperation at every level from the local to the global. That’s what Voices of Humanity (VoH) is, a new kind of social medium designed to foster human unity in a complicated and unpredictable world. Voices of Humanity has the flexibility needed to cope with the unexpected. Give it a try and see for yourself at

The VoH software puts together three formats: 1) the group list-serve / forum, which gives local civic society organizing efforts a way to communicate within the group; 2) the social media format with a “wall” and “friends,” which enables participation at the individual level; and 3) the local-to-global Voices of Humanity discussion, which enables collective participation by gender and age, city and nation.

The Voices of Humanity discussion is organized around a monthly cycle and is open to participation by both individuals and by group members. At every new moon, a new discussion period begins. During the month, participants write “candidate” messages. They also read, rate and comment on candidate messages written by others. Results of the ratings for the previous month are easily viewed with “winners” displayed for each of the six voices of humanity: humanity-as-one, women, men, youth, middle-aged and seniors.

Another feature that sets Voices of Humanity apart is its local-to-global geographic slider. The geographic slider lets the participant shift the focus from city to metro to province/state to nation to Planet Earth. At each level, only messages written by others who share the same locale with the participant are visible. Results from the previous month are likewise narrowed if the setting is below the global level. This means we can see the overall winner for San Francisco or Greater Cairo or for Japan. The ability to go down to the city level will be useful for organizing bottom up participation by networks of cities, such as Cities for CEDAW or Mayors for Peace or Sister Cities or Cities of Compassion.

Checkboxes for Indigenous, Interfaith, Other minority, and Veterans make it easy for people who identify with these groupings to have their own global voices by gender and age as well as overall. It is an exciting prospect – imagine a collective voice for indigenous peoples from all areas of the world! How curious to bring veterans together from all nations. Theirs will be a voice for peace!

Importantly, candidate messages for the current month can be in reply to one of the winners from the previous month at any level. This sets up the possibility of an exchange of messages between the six voices and across levels. For instance, Indigenous Youth of Quebec might reply to the previous month’s winning message from the Women of the Central African Republic.

The VoH software will give a collective voice not just to the genders and generations, but also to the nations. In the process, the animosities that block full international cooperation will be dissolved. Why? Because a collective national voice in the context of 1) a global Voice of Humanity-as-one, and 2) a simultaneous exchange between the genders and generations within the nation in question, will not fall prey to fear and hate. Hardliners will stay away because merely by participating, they will be supporting human unity.

Coming up by January, there will be a way to use specially designed hierarchical hashtags to specify a topic and its subtopics. At the new moon, results will be available for the six voices of humanity for each topic and subtopic with concurrent local-to-global selection also available. A writeup using the SDGs as a good example is available here:

The great difficulty is to incentivize participation, especially at the beginning. The planned solution is to use crowdfunding to collect money that will be given to the author of the humanity-as-one winner each month for distribution to the NGO of that author’s choice. I call the program “Make your gift work twice,” ie, once to incentivize participation and again to fund a non-profit. This program could bring in local non-profits who are hoping to win funding. DWF might want to encourage participation of its members.

My latest writeup of the positives and negatives of the Voices of Humanity project is here: There are plenty of negatives. The software is still at the prototype stage, but already it is in working order and by the beginning of 2016, the remaining bugs and quirks will be taken care of


So that’s it. Adopt The Goals of the UN as a strategic goal for DWF. Network with other organizations that have this same strategic goal. Work to convince the SDG people that disarmament would give the biggest possible boost to the SDGs. Aim for a nonviolent Global Citizen’s Movement (GCM) that pushes for The Goals of the UN. Use and support Voices of Humanity as a tool for building the GCM.


Roger Eaton
+1 415 933 0153
UNA-SF Communications Chair
Voices of Humanity


NOTE: The Democratic World Federalists are committed to expressing a wide range of views on the vision of creating a peaceful, just, and sustainable world through a democratic World Federation. The views expressed in this article represents that commitment and not necessarily our official position.


An Essential Missing Ingredient

An Essential Missing Ingredient

Byron Belitsosby Byron Belitsos
Managing Editor

We world federalists realize that our ideal is not easily attainable and that it is rarely discussed in the mainstream. We are painfully aware that many “practical” people consider democratic world government and the abolition of war impossible to achieve. And all of their criticisms are understandable in the current environment, given the dominant global role of a few unyielding nations —notably those that are the most heavily armed and who possess veto power in the Security Council.

The inordinate difficulty of reforming the United Nations to achieve a justly governed world helps explain why the world peace and sustainability movements have turned elsewhere for answers . They usually ignore the issue of global governance, although they may advocate for the occasional treaty or support specific UN initiatives such as “Paris 2015” (the UN’s Climate Change Conference). More often, these popular movements emphasize a diverse patchwork of NGO-led efforts to resolve conflict and address environmental problems; they also carry out important consciousness-raising efforts in many forums.

Most recently the global peace movement has focused on creating a “culture of peace”—the promotion of nonviolence and the need to exercise love, inclusion, altruism, dialogue, and tolerance. It holds to the high ideal that we need to cultivate a deeper sense of the intrinsic unity of humankind as the prerequisite to creating world peace. Of course, these methods and ideals are profoundly important. The unity of humankind as one human race of brothers and sisters—and the concept of the interdependence and sacredness of all of life on this planet—are perhaps the greatest ideas ever propounded by our planet’s visionaries and prophets; these are in fact the governing ideals of the world federalist movement as well. A worldwide culture of peace and a heart-felt sense of human unity are indispensable for any sort of progress in global transformation.

But we believe that one essential ingredient is missing if our objective is to end the systems that produce war and environmental destruction. This ingredient is—to put it bluntly—the presence of world law, global jurisprudence, democratic deliberation, and genuine “government of, by, and for the people” at the global level. We world federalists certainly want and support love, peace, unity, and the evolution of consciousness and culture—but our crucial role is to approach these things from the standpoint of law, courts, and government. Simply put, we believe that love and law must rise together. We teach that enforceable global law must be present to support a unified and peaceful global culture that protects and honors life.

“Law,” the poet Mark Van Doren once explained, “is merely the thing that lets us live in peace with our neighbors without having to love them.” Enforceable law is not nearly as good a thing as spiritual consciousness or moral maturity—the ability to love and serve others and protect all living things. But without basic guarantees of safety and security made possible by law, the result we will get is violence, conflict, and the exploitation of nature. In fact, such is the predominant state of things on our planet at present.

We wouldn’t think of a town, a county, a state, or a nation without law and democratic government. But we rarely consider that these things should be required at the global level. As a result, our world lives in a state of virtual lawlessness, given that international treaties are de jure nonbinding. When under threat, persons as well as nations will naturally resort to the law of force when the force of law is not available. If one’s very survival is at stake, we tend to forget about love, community, inclusion, and tolerance. We will not hesitate to abandon treaty obligations. Instead we instinctively resort to naked force to protect our loved ones, our livelihood, or our lands. Safety at all costs becomes the priority, the “other” becomes an enemy, and law takes a back seat. Only with the achievement of justice through enforceable law can love can come back into the equation. Or rather, the two must be sought together.

History provides proof that the rule of law is indispensable for avoiding the spiral of violence and mistrust that the lack of law always creates. Enforceable law is in fact the prerequisite for generating sufficient amounts of good will in daily life so that a society based on love, tolerance, unity, reverence for life, and compassion may have a chance to evolve—as these things cannot be directly legislated. Once again: Love and law always seem to arise together in a symbiotic fashion. And this is why we continue to say that law is the missing ingredient at the global level.

NOTE: The Democratic World Federalists are committed to expressing a wide range of views on the vision of creating a peaceful, just, and sustainable world through a democratic World Federation. The views expressed in this article represents that commitment and not necessarily our official position.

Lively Debate on UN Commission’s Report

Our readers may recall the coverage we gave to the recent report of the UN’s Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. Since then, a healthy debate has been growing in our immediate circle. Tad Daley’s recent essay at Huffington Post offers a bit of praise for the report, calling it “visionary.” But he’s also not shy to point out what they forgot to mention: the need to abolish the veto, establish a UN citizen’s assembly, and create a permanent all-volunteer UN rapid deployment force. He also suggests that we can begin right now to advocate such provisions in time for the UN’s 75th anniversary year in 2020, the date that the Commission suggests for convening a “World Conference on Global Institutions.” Board member and DWF Vice President Roger Kotila could find very little that was positive in the report . . .


NOTE: The Democratic World Federalists are committed to expressing a wide range of views on the vision of creating a peaceful, just, and sustainable world through a democratic World Federation. The views expressed in this article represents that commitment and not necessarily our official position.